I truly don't. And, and the other thing
, Mario, and this will probably move uh Morph
into an answer to some of your other questions.
And that is the, the role of Iowa here
. Um Who wins on Monday night is certainly headline
material, but we don't exist as first in the
nation. We don't exist as a part of the
carve out system. Uh because of who wins out
43% of the time the winner of Iowa turns out
to be the, the actual um our, our
, our nominee, what we're supposed to do and
I know New Hampshire sometimes gets a little carried away
and say we pick presidents, you pick court that
easy. No, we all in the carve out
system are supposed to give a neutral, fair hearing
to our candidates. So we've done that. I
think you would ask all four of the leading,
actually every single candidate in Iowa, they would say
that they had a fair hearing, they had robust
turnout, their events. So worst case scenario,
we've done our job as to what the RNC wants
it to be. I will guarantee you that we
can immediately move to the old fashioned system. In
fact, even those precinct, uh, recorders,
they can actually use our app, which many of
them are going to. It's easy for us.
I hope they do, but they can actually call
in the results and we can move entirely to a
manual system and we can still preserve voter intake no
matter what. Because you count the votes in the
same room, you report the votes in the same
room and the people in the room that just voted
can actually double check and look on the Iowa website
when we report out to all you and they can
triple check once again what we've done. So I
feel I, I don't, I honestly do not
see a scenario where our process can actually be con
uh uh declared anything other than transparent and voter integrity
at the model level. I, I just don't
see, see a scenario and believe me, we've
brainstormed every scenario you can think of.